Ok, bruce. I had sometime to think about this as the SOB project is on hold since I need to get some more parts. And so, while I was sitting there, unwinding my mind, I decided to note everything on this project.....Yes, we have 5mm under there! 5mm minus 1.6 and its
just enough. But not so fast, sonny! See below!
But the legs, man. The legs! Maybe have todrill the holes because the main display ishitting his shins. He ain't got nowhere togo, man and we can't kill his heels. All is good here, 6 squares on the left and 5on the right, but man, the SMT in the threeclocks in the middle is the pain in the ass. You think this would work, hmm? Have thembuggers drill a 5mm in the middle la. And also have them buggers drill one at the bottomtoo. Else, ain't no way to see the lights, man. I spoke to another about the fig and he might proto the clear across the sea. But a skilled artist is still not here yet. So, proto first, sticky up him ala firefly.
And so, after telling them to shut the TV off, they got bored almost immediately. With no VCD to dance to, they decided to do something else. That is when Kaelynn remembered the pop-pops Mommy kept on top of the fridge, wanting to throw it away. This was one of Kaelynn's favourite things.Pop-pops are small little fireworks which explodes on impact. Originally, they were wrapped in tissue-paper thus giving a tear-drop shape. Now, the modern ones were shaped like a tube, the size of those electrical fuses. And they're more 'sensitive' to impact too.Once I helped her get the box of pop-pops, the girls rushed out ofthe door, ready to play. Kristine ran back into the house, covering her ears
once she realised what the pop-pops were. Yep,
she is still afraid of fireworks and explosions. So,
this means more pop-pops for Kaelynn to throw... Imagine if you dropped a carton of pop-pops onthe floor. One carton holds about, I think, 48 orso. But it would cost me RM18.00 to find out. And so, Kaelynn enjoyed herself for the rest ofthe evening. Maybe i should give her the rocket
with exploding caps, one of my favourites but I
was more concerned about the gunpowder
going into her through her fingers.......
Yeah, although its Saturday and what perceived to be a quiet day, it was not. I ma stuck in this project and there was no one I could talk to for ideas. It also did not help that THAT SOMEONE for some unknown reasons, caused my Notebook to go crashing. And it also did not help that the same SOMEONE called when I was soldering, causing a short in the board and killing one IC when I shouted and cursed at him.This was not an easy project as I thought it would. I mean, how difficult was it to countdown from '999' to '000' and stop there until it is being reset? The answer, my friends, is easy and not so easy, depending on how and which solution you're aiming at.The easy wayThis was the route I took since the initial description was to have it countdown from 999 to zero. All I have to do is to get some off the shelf electronic kits and its done. And it fits my timetable perfectly. No problems, right?Wrong.You see, the problem starts when it was needed to count down from '999' as the circuit starts with '000'. Once I got a copy of the IC's datasheet, I realised why. And so, to get it start from '999' I would now have to hotwire the original circuit to load in the value '999' instead.And then, as luck would have it, there is no clock signal to the kit which I must buy separately. And it must make the circuit count down very fast. So, I have to modify the kit to do that.The third problem is that it must stop counting at '000' until a 'Reset' button is pushed where it would go to '999'. Which again, the datasheet proves the IC does not do that. So, this means I would have to obtain more ICs as I would need a few logic gates to do this.Let's see, our original 7 IC circuit is now beingexpanded to a few more ICs. And when it doeswork, boy, its going to kill the batteries. This is the circuit I am testing out on the whiteprototype breadboard. It involves three ICs, atransistor and a switch-over relay. My only fearis that the circuit would be too fast to for thissub-circuit to 'catch' the signals. The not so easy way.This is the alternative soluton to the same design but the end result is the same and/or even better. The catch? You have to learn the microprocessor's programming language. Compared to the 'old school' solution above which not only uses more than ten ICs, this one uses only one. Because of that, it saves power too. This is actually my backup plan and after weeks of trying to figure things out, it just came to me this afternoon. So, I'll just have to get the IC next week and do the testing, see if this idea works.This one little IC can take on all 10 uncles and without breaking a sweat. The only one sweatingis me, trying to figure how to tell it to work.......